In a major legal twist, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal case against former President Donald Trump over his alleged mishandling of classified documents. The July 15, 2024 ruling found that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, invalidating the indictment and halting one of the most high-profile cases against a former president.
Case Background
The case stemmed from missing documents discovered by the National Archives in 2021. Despite repeated requests, Trump failed to return the materials, leading to an FBI raid in August 2022 that recovered over 100 classified documents. A grand jury later indicted Trump on 37 felony counts, including obstruction and illegal retention of national defense information.
Judge’s Ruling and Reactions
Cannon, a Trump appointee, ruled that Smith’s appointment violated the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. Legal experts say her decision challenges longstanding precedent, including United States v. Nixon (1974). Trump’s supporters celebrated the decision as a victory, while critics warned it could weaken accountability for top officials. Smith’s office plans to appeal.
Wider Implications
The decision complicates efforts to prosecute Trump, especially with the 2024 election already over and Trump now re-elected. The DOJ also dropped election interference charges against him, following its policy against prosecuting sitting presidents.
What’s Next?
Cannon’s ruling may shape future debates about the limits of presidential power and the role of special counsels. Legal scholars anticipate ongoing appeals and possible legislative action to clarify these constitutional gray areas.
